The current debate in Quebec is interesting. I suspect that it is
a response to what is happening in many European countries, where Muslims are hijacking religious and cultural values
in their adopted countries.
That certainly is a very valid concern. Islam, while not
unique in this regard, is nevertheless one of the few religions that takes the
view that if the religion is valid, then you cannot let it live only in the
mosque, but must allow it to permeate your whole life. Christians don’t take this view. They seem to realize, whether they admit it
or not, that their religion has no validity in the real world.
However, the Quebec response is a curtailment of civil
rights for everyone, exactly what they
are afraid that Muslims would ultimately do. It’s a natural response to bullies, hit back (not a bad idea actually),
but in this case they are hitting back at everybody.
A better tactic, I think, would be to put in place laws and policies
that make sure that each and every person can pursue their own beliefs but are prevented from imposing
them in any way on others. That is, after all the real concern, and it
is a valid one, concerning what is happening in England and other European
countries, where Muslims have virtually taken over some districts and are
verbally and physically attacking anyone that violates what they consider to be
Muslim values.
In general, I don't agree with a general restriction of rights. The burka, however, is a more complicated issue. Total face covering provides anonymity, which fundamentally hides or conceals your identity or individuality. I suppose that, if that is your desire, the state should not deny you the right to do so, but, you must be ready to accept reasonable consequences of your actions, such as loss of some rights and services.
I think that shop owners, for example, should be allowed to deny service, or even access, to those wearing a burka, after all, how could you be sure it isn't a suicide bomber in duisgise?
Some services offered by the state simply cannot be provided anonymously, services such as passports, drivers licenses, etc., where
identification is essential. Similarly, many of the rights individuals have in
a court of law should also be denied. In general, if you do not wish to interact with society as an individual, society should not have to treat you as one.
This approach would be more in keeping with Canadian values. After all, our country is founded on freedom for everyone and we must make sure that neither religious fundamentalists nor fearful governments erode those values. So I find it incongruous that the Quebec Government should call this misguided legislation a "Charter of Values" when it so obviously is in opposition to Canada's values. But then, the current Quebec Government doesn't consider themselves to be part of Canada does it.
No comments:
Post a Comment